Archive for the ‘General Interest’ Category

A Progressive Viewpoint

Friday, September 28th, 2012

Many progressives share views with libertarians:

  • fiscally conservative
  • pragmatic
  • believe in freedom.

But progressives are compassionate and insist on society’s roll in helping those in need. A progressive person would never suggest that fire departments should be privatized and require a subscription to get fire protection.

Here is a list of some of my core beliefs-

  • Medicare for all.
  • Free quality education.
  • Make all drugs and drug use legal with a doctors prescription. Treat drug use like a medical problem, not a legal problem.
  • Legalize non-violent activity between consenting adults.
  • Drastically reduce the military budget. Close overseas bases unless we can partner with another nation at each one for staffing and expenses. Presently the USA spends as much as the next 17 countries combined, and 15 of them are our allies. The USA has 5% of the world population and spends 50% of the money spent in the world on military.
  • A Balanced Budget Amendment (except in times of DECLARED WAR).
  • A fair tax system that is not regressive (like sales tax), but very progressive. Throw out the entire tax code and start over with an income tax with no deductions.
  • The USA should be more concerned about contract law than people’s sex lives. Get the USA out of the sex business. Instead of gay marriage, civil unions for everyone. If you want to get _married_ go to your church and it is between you and the church. If you go to city hall, civil union.
  • Corporations are not people (and shouldn’t pay ANY taxes- only people should pay taxes).
  • Income is income. No type of income is better or worse than any other type of income. It should all be taxed the same way (a progressive rate).
  • Money is NOT speech! (see: http://MoveToAmend.org)

 

FineArtWork.com is UP!

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

Lorraine’s new website is up!

See it here: http://FineArtWork.com

Please buy a print or two if you want to support it.

Version 0.0

Wednesday, September 17th, 2008

Well here we are on CodeInsight.com! I’ve been writing code for a very long time now and I have a lot to share. I am working on a .Net wrapper for the GNU GSL (See GSL it here) Here’s what I’ve got so far: Gnu.dll. It is a bit generous for me to use the namespace Gnu, but there is a lot of open source legacy “C” code that I’d like to wrap for use in .Net, and the “Gnu” namespace seemed the most appropriate.

I really like .Net and think that it is long overdue. I have been writing code pretty much entirely on MS-DOS and Windows since 1986 and I have used Microsoft products pretty consistently the entire time. As far as MS code development, the only MS products I haven’t used are COBOL and Fortran (although I have use Fortran on other platforms). I have also had the pleasure of dealing with MS for support over the years. When MS came out with Visual Studio 1.0 for use on Windows 3.0 in 1992 they really took a step backwards from Programmer’s Workbench. PWB was almost as good as emacs as a code development platform. But heck, VS 1.0 didn’t even have regular expressions in the editor- how lame is that? Plus it came on 22 floppies and took over 3 hours to install! But the telephone tech support was pretty good, and VS did improve over the years. I was really happy when VS 5.0 came out and had incremental compiles and “Edit & Continue” for C+. I thought that was just soo coool!

When .Net came out in 2002 I thought that VS took another leap forward. I really liked VS 6.0, but VS.Net was missing something I always took for granted in VB: Edit & Continue! How could they take it away??? At least they still had it in C++, which was really killer. When VS.Net 2003 came out I was happy with it too. But when VS.Net 2005 came out I was immediately disappointed!

Sure, VS.Net 2005 had lots of great new features and it claimed to have Edit & Continue, but the debugger was broken! At least the debugger was broken for use in “mixed mode” development (managed/unmanaged solutions). Back in the day, a mixed mode project was using different development platforms like C, assembly, and VB, and then linking them together, something I have done since ‘93 when I got VB 3.0. I still like to use VB as the GUI and C++ Dll’s for the implementation. The legacy code I use interfaces quite nicely with .Net, if you know how to do it (thus the port of GSL).

You see in VS.Net 2005 in the unmanaged code you can either set a breakpoint or edit the code during a break in a debug session, but not both! And it is a hassle to switch the modes.

One week before the official release of VS.Net 2005 I created a bug report on this at the MS web site. The lame-o’s at MS tech support kept insisting that this was a feature not a bug, since Edit & Continue was not supported in mixed mode. My point was that I didn’t care if the code didn’t compile and run on the fly, I only want to edit it while I stepped through the code, so as to correct and improve it during the debug session!